Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"_ computations using conducting and" » "_ computation using conducting and" (Expand search), "_ populations using conducting and" (Expand search), "_ computations in conducting and" (Expand search), "_ computations using conductive and" (Expand search), "_ computations using superconducting and" (Expand search), "_ computations using conductance and" (Expand search), "_ computations using conduct and" (Expand search), "_ computations using conductivity and" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"_ computations using conducting and\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( _ computations using conducting and ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("_ computations using conducting and") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.