Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"_ computations in segment programming" » "_ computations in fragment programming" (Expand search), "_ computations in agent programming" (Expand search), "_ computations in element programming" (Expand search), "_ computation in segment programming" (Expand search), "_ computation of segment programming" (Expand search), "_ computation and segment programming" (Expand search), "_ computations in segments programming" (Expand search), "_ computations on segment programming" (Expand search), "_ computations in segmental programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"_ computations in segment programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( _ computations in segment programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("_ computations in segment programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.