Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"_ computations in robot programming" » "_ computations in robots programming" (Expand search), "_ computations in goal programming" (Expand search), "_ computations in cone programming" (Expand search), "_ computation in robot programming" (Expand search), "_ computation of robot programming" (Expand search), "_ computation and robot programming" (Expand search), "_ computations in robotic programming" (Expand search), "_ computations in robert programming" (Expand search), "_ computations _ robot programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("_ computations in robot programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"_ computations in robot programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( _ computations in robot programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.