Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"_ computations in predicting coding" » "_ computations in predictive coding" (Expand search), "_ computations in prediction coding" (Expand search), "_ computations in predicting modeling" (Expand search), "_ computation in predicting coding" (Expand search), "_ computation of predicting coding" (Expand search), "_ computation and predicting coding" (Expand search), "_ computations _ predicting coding" (Expand search), "_ computations in preventing coding" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("_ computations in predicting coding") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"_ computations in predicting coding\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( _ computations in predicting coding ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("_ computations in predicting coding") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.