Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"_ computationally code coverage on" » "_ computational code coverage on" (Expand search), "_ computationally aided coverage on" (Expand search), "_ computational codes coverage on" (Expand search), "_ computationally care coverage on" (Expand search), "_ computationally and coverage on" (Expand search), "_ computationally the coverage on" (Expand search), "_ computationally code coverage of" (Expand search), "_ computationally code coverage in" (Expand search), "_ computationally code coverage and" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("_ computationally code coverage on") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"_ computationally code coverage on\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( _ computationally code coverage on ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("_ computationally code coverage on") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.