Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"_ computational using refraction errors" » "_ computation using refraction errors" (Expand search), "_ computations using refraction errors" (Expand search), "_ computacional usinas refraction errors" (Expand search), "_ computational using refractive errors" (Expand search), "_ computational using refractive error" (Expand search), "_ computational using refractive erros" (Expand search), "_ computational using reaction errors" (Expand search), "_ computational using fraction errors" (Expand search), "_ computational using restriction errors" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("_ computational using refraction errors") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"_ computational using refraction errors\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( _ computational using refraction errors ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("_ computational using refraction errors") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.