Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"_ computational using conductive process" » "_ computation using conductive process" (Expand search), "_ computations using conductive process" (Expand search), "_ computacional usinas conductive process" (Expand search), "_ computational using conductive processes" (Expand search), "_ computational using conjunctive process" (Expand search), "_ computational using conduction process" (Expand search), "_ computational in conductive process" (Expand search), "_ computational using collective process" (Expand search), "_ computational using reductive process" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("_ computational using conductive process") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"_ computational using conductive process\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( _ computational using conductive process ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("_ computational using conductive process") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.