Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"_ computational refusing in programming" » "_ computational refunding in programming" (Expand search), "_ computational learning in programming" (Expand search), "_ computational routine in programming" (Expand search), "_ computational refusing and programming" (Expand search), "_ computational refusing _ programming" (Expand search), "_ computational refusing c programming" (Expand search), "_ computational refusing an programming" (Expand search), "_ computational reusing in programming" (Expand search), "_ computational rehousing in programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("_ computational refusing in programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"_ computational refusing in programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( _ computational refusing in programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.