Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"_ computational in conducting oxide" » "_ computational and conducting oxide" (Expand search), "_ computational _ conducting oxide" (Expand search), "_ computational 3d conducting oxide" (Expand search), "_ computational in conducting and" (Expand search), "_ computational ion conducting oxide" (Expand search), "_ computational of conducting oxide" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("_ computational in conducting oxide") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"_ computational in conducting oxide\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( _ computational in conducting oxide ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("_ computational in conducting oxide") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.