Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"_ computational efficient computing code" » "_ computationally efficient computing code" (Expand search), "_ computational efficiency computing code" (Expand search), "_ computacional eficiente computing code" (Expand search), "_ computational efficient routing code" (Expand search), "_ computational efficient computation code" (Expand search), "_ computational efficient dominating code" (Expand search), "_ computational efficient computing ode" (Expand search), "_ computational efficient computing pode" (Expand search), "_ computational efficient computing model" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("_ computational efficient computing code") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"_ computational efficient computing code\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( _ computational efficient computing code ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.