Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"_ computational codes object programming" » "_ computational code object programming" (Expand search), "_ computational models object programming" (Expand search), "_ computational model object programming" (Expand search), "_ computational codes subject programming" (Expand search), "_ computational codes objective programming" (Expand search), "_ computational codes content programming" (Expand search), "_ computational models objects programming" (Expand search), "_ computational body object programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("_ computational codes object programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"_ computational codes object programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( _ computational codes object programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.