Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"_ computational code octave programming" » "_ computational model octave programming" (Expand search), "_ computational cost octave programming" (Expand search), "_ computational models octave programming" (Expand search), "_ computational code stage programming" (Expand search), "_ computational code objective programming" (Expand search), "_ computational code reactive programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("_ computational code octave programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"_ computational code octave programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( _ computational code octave programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("_ computational code octave programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.