Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"_ computational code documentation on" » "_ computational model documentation on" (Expand search), "_ computational cost documentation on" (Expand search), "_ computational models documentation on" (Expand search), "_ computational care documentation on" (Expand search), "_ computational and documentation on" (Expand search), "_ computational code documentation of" (Expand search), "_ computational code documentation in" (Expand search), "_ computational code documentation and" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"_ computational code documentation on\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( _ computational code documentation on ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("_ computational code documentation on") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.