Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"using computation in augment programming" » "using computation in agent programming" (Expand search), "using computation in fragment programming" (Expand search), "using computation in element programming" (Expand search), "using computational in augment programming" (Expand search), "using imputation in augment programming" (Expand search), "using compilation in augment programming" (Expand search), "using computation and augment programming" (Expand search), "using computation of augment programming" (Expand search), "using computation an augment programming" (Expand search), "using computation in augmented programming" (Expand search), "using computation can augment programming" (Expand search)
"_ computational code coding program" » "_ computational model coding program" (Expand search), "_ computational cost coding program" (Expand search), "_ computational models coding program" (Expand search), "_ computational code cloning program" (Expand search), "_ computational code loading program" (Expand search), "_ computational code cooling programs" (Expand search), "_ computational code codigo program" (Expand search), "_ computational code according program" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("_ computational code coding program") OR ("using computation in augment programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"_ computational code coding program\") OR (\"using computation in augment programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( _ computational code coding program ) OR ( using computation in augment programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("_ computational code coding program") OR ("using computation in augment programming"))*.