Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"_ computational code active programming" » "_ computational model active programming" (Expand search), "_ computational cost active programming" (Expand search), "_ computational models active programming" (Expand search), "_ computational code reactive programming" (Expand search), "_ computational code octave programming" (Expand search), "_ computational code adaptive programming" (Expand search), "_ computational mode active programming" (Expand search), "_ computational anode active programming" (Expand search), "_ computational ecole active programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("_ computational code active programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"_ computational code active programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( _ computational code active programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.