Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"_ computation using reduce errors" » "_ computations using reduce errors" (Expand search), "_ computation in reduce errors" (Expand search), "_ composition using reduce errors" (Expand search), "_ computation using reducing errors" (Expand search), "_ computation using induced errors" (Expand search), "_ computation using reduce effort" (Expand search), "_ computation using reduced errors" (Expand search), "_ computation using reductive errors" (Expand search), "_ computation using mapreduce errors" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("_ computation using reduce errors") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"_ computation using reduce errors\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( _ computation using reduce errors ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.