Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"_ computation using logical programming" » "_ computation using logic programming" (Expand search), "_ computation using goal programming" (Expand search), "_ computation using conic programming" (Expand search), "_ computations using logical programming" (Expand search), "_ computation in logical programming" (Expand search), "_ composition using logical programming" (Expand search), "_ computation using local programming" (Expand search), "_ computation using topical programming" (Expand search), "_ computation using lexical programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"_ computation using logical programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( _ computation using logical programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("_ computation using logical programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.