Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"_ computation using imperative programming" » "_ computation using generative programming" (Expand search), "_ computation using competitive programming" (Expand search), "_ computation using temperature programming" (Expand search), "_ computations using imperative programming" (Expand search), "_ computation in imperative programming" (Expand search), "_ composition using imperative programming" (Expand search), "_ computation using iterative programming" (Expand search), "_ computation using comparative programming" (Expand search), "_ computation using interactive programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"_ computation using imperative programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( _ computation using imperative programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("_ computation using imperative programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.