Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"_ computation using effluent programming" » "_ computation using efficient programming" (Expand search), "_ computation using different programming" (Expand search), "_ computation using offline programming" (Expand search), "_ computations using effluent programming" (Expand search), "_ computation in effluent programming" (Expand search), "_ composition using effluent programming" (Expand search), "_ computation washing effluent programming" (Expand search), "_ computation mining effluent programming" (Expand search), "_ computation dyeing effluent programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("_ computation using effluent programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"_ computation using effluent programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( _ computation using effluent programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("_ computation using effluent programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.