Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"_ computation using coupling processes" » "_ computation using counting processes" (Expand search), "_ computation using cooling processes" (Expand search), "_ computation using coating processes" (Expand search), "_ computations using coupling processes" (Expand search), "_ computation in coupling processes" (Expand search), "_ composition using coupling processes" (Expand search), "_ computation running coupling processes" (Expand search), "_ computation using competing processes" (Expand search), "_ computation using coupled processes" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("_ computation using coupling processes") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"_ computation using coupling processes\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( _ computation using coupling processes ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("_ computation using coupling processes") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.