Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"_ computation using conductive processes" » "_ computation using conduction processes" (Expand search), "_ computation using convective processes" (Expand search), "_ computation using constructive processes" (Expand search), "_ computations using conductive processes" (Expand search), "_ computation in conductive processes" (Expand search), "_ composition using conductive processes" (Expand search), "_ computation using collective processes" (Expand search), "_ computation using reductive processes" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("_ computation using conductive processes") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"_ computation using conductive processes\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( _ computation using conductive processes ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.