Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"_ computation using conducting wire" » "_ computations using conducting wire" (Expand search), "_ computation in conducting wire" (Expand search), "_ composition using conducting wire" (Expand search), "_ computation using conductive wire" (Expand search), "_ computation using superconducting wire" (Expand search), "_ computation using conducting pre" (Expand search), "_ computation using conducting oxide" (Expand search), "_ computation using conducting the" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("_ computation using conducting wire") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"_ computation using conducting wire\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( _ computation using conducting wire ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.