Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"_ computation using conducting process" » "_ computation using conduction process" (Expand search), "_ computation using conductance process" (Expand search), "_ computation using contracting process" (Expand search), "_ computations using conducting process" (Expand search), "_ computation in conducting process" (Expand search), "_ composition using conducting process" (Expand search), "_ computation using conductive process" (Expand search), "_ computation using superconducting process" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("_ computation using conducting process") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"_ computation using conducting process\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( _ computation using conducting process ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("_ computation using conducting process") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.