Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"_ computation using communicative processes" » "_ computation using communication processes" (Expand search), "_ computation using communicational processes" (Expand search), "_ computation using communication process" (Expand search), "_ computation acting communicative processes" (Expand search), "_ computation in communicative processes" (Expand search), "_ computation nursing communication processes" (Expand search), "_ computations using communicative processes" (Expand search), "_ composition using communicative processes" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"_ computation using communicative processes\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( _ computation using communicative processes ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("_ computation using communicative processes") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.