Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"_ computation using commitment problems" » "_ computation using commitment problem" (Expand search), "_ computation using commitment profiles" (Expand search), "_ computations using commitment problems" (Expand search), "_ computation in commitment problems" (Expand search), "_ composition using commitment problems" (Expand search), "_ computation joint commitment problems" (Expand search), "_ computation business commitment problems" (Expand search), "_ computation winning commitment problems" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"_ computation using commitment problems\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( _ computation using commitment problems ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("_ computation using commitment problems") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.