Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"_ computation in reactive errors" » "_ computation in refractive errors" (Expand search), "_ computation in refractive error" (Expand search), "_ computation in active error" (Expand search), "_ computation and reactive errors" (Expand search), "_ computation of reactive errors" (Expand search), "_ imputation in reactive errors" (Expand search), "_ computation c reactive errors" (Expand search), "_ computation by reactive errors" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("_ computation in reactive errors") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"_ computation in reactive errors\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( _ computation in reactive errors ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("_ computation in reactive errors") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.