Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"_ computation in octave programming" » "_ computation in stage programming" (Expand search), "_ computation in objective programming" (Expand search), "_ computation in reactive programming" (Expand search), "_ computation and octave programming" (Expand search), "_ computation of octave programming" (Expand search), "_ imputation in octave programming" (Expand search), "_ computation gnu octave programming" (Expand search), "_ computation n octane programming" (Expand search), "_ computation _ octave programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("_ computation in octave programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"_ computation in octave programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( _ computation in octave programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("_ computation in octave programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.