Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"_ computation in literate programming" » "_ computation in discrete programming" (Expand search), "_ computation in disease programming" (Expand search), "_ computation in generative programming" (Expand search), "_ computation and literate programming" (Expand search), "_ computation of literate programming" (Expand search), "_ imputation in literate programming" (Expand search), "_ computation in literature programming" (Expand search), "_ computation in illiterate programming" (Expand search), "_ computation non literate programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("_ computation in literate programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"_ computation in literate programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( _ computation in literate programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("_ computation in literate programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.