Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"_ computation in explosive programming" » "_ computation in inclusive programming" (Expand search), "_ computation in copositive programming" (Expand search), "_ computation in expression programming" (Expand search), "_ computation and explosive programming" (Expand search), "_ computation of explosive programming" (Expand search), "_ imputation in explosive programming" (Expand search), "_ computation on explosive programming" (Expand search), "_ computation in exclusive programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("_ computation in explosive programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"_ computation in explosive programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( _ computation in explosive programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("_ computation in explosive programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.