Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"_ computation in coding proposals" » "_ computation in zoning proposals" (Expand search), "_ computation in bidding proposals" (Expand search), "_ computation in binding proposals" (Expand search), "_ computation and coding proposals" (Expand search), "_ computation of coding proposals" (Expand search), "_ imputation in coding proposals" (Expand search), "_ computation in decoding proposals" (Expand search), "_ computation non coding proposals" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("_ computation in coding proposals") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"_ computation in coding proposals\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( _ computation in coding proposals ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.