Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"_ computation in active programing" » "_ computation in reactive programing" (Expand search), "_ computation in reactive programming" (Expand search), "_ computation in octave programming" (Expand search), "_ computation and active programing" (Expand search), "_ computation of active programing" (Expand search), "_ imputation in active programing" (Expand search), "_ computation an active programing" (Expand search), "_ computation in action programing" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("_ computation in active programing") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"_ computation in active programing\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( _ computation in active programing ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("_ computation in active programing") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.