Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"3d convolutional coding using projections" » "3d convolutional codes using projections" (Expand search), "3d convolutional code using projections" (Expand search), "3d convolutional long using projections" (Expand search), "3d convolutional coding using production" (Expand search), "3d convolutional coding using projective" (Expand search), "3d convolutional coding in projections" (Expand search), "and convolutional coding using projections" (Expand search), "of convolutional coding using projections" (Expand search), "_ convolutional coding using projections" (Expand search), "3d convolutional loading using projections" (Expand search), "3d convolutional modeling using projections" (Expand search), "3d convolutional drying using projections" (Expand search)
"advanced glycerin from python programming" » "advanced glycation from python programming" (Expand search), "advanced glication from python programming" (Expand search), "advanced polymeric from python programming" (Expand search), "advanced glycerol from python programming" (Expand search), "advanced glycerin on python programming" (Expand search), "advanced glycerin from pathogen programming" (Expand search), "advanced glycerin from anthony programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"3d convolutional coding using projections\") OR (\"advanced glycerin from python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( 3d convolutional coding using projections ) OR ( advanced glycerin from python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("3d convolutional coding using projections") OR ("advanced glycerin from python programming"))*.