Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"2d convolutional coding using projections" » "2d convolutional codes using projections" (Expand search), "2d convolutional code using projections" (Expand search), "2d convolutional long using projections" (Expand search), "2d convolutional coding using production" (Expand search), "2d convolutional coding using projective" (Expand search), "2d convolutional coding in projections" (Expand search), "3d convolutional coding using projections" (Expand search), "and convolutional coding using projections" (Expand search), "of convolutional coding using projections" (Expand search), "2d convolutional loading using projections" (Expand search), "2d convolutional modeling using projections" (Expand search), "2d convolutional drying using projections" (Expand search)
"change implications from python programming" » "care implications from python programming" (Expand search), "the implications from python programming" (Expand search), "change implications of python programming" (Expand search), "change implications on python programming" (Expand search), "change implications to python programming" (Expand search), "change implications from pathogen programming" (Expand search), "change implications from anthony programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("2d convolutional coding using projections") OR ("change implications from python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"2d convolutional coding using projections\") OR (\"change implications from python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( 2d convolutional coding using projections ) OR ( change implications from python programming ))*.