Talvez deva tentar algumas variações de ortografia:
"coder coder coding more effective" » "coder coder coding the effective" (Expandir a busca), "coder modern coding more effective" (Expandir a busca), "coder color coding more effective" (Expandir a busca), "coder odor coding more effective" (Expandir a busca), "coder decoder coding more effective" (Expandir a busca), "code code coding more effective" (Expandir a busca), "decoder codec coding more effective" (Expandir a busca), "coder coder coding mode effective" (Expandir a busca), "coder coder coming more effective" (Expandir a busca), "coder coder coding model effective" (Expandir a busca)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expandir a busca), "in piton python python programming" (Expandir a busca), "in pitons python python programming" (Expandir a busca), "_ python python python programming" (Expandir a busca)

Você pode obter mais resultados ajustando o argumento de busca.

• Fazer uma busca fuzzy pode resultar em termos de grafias semelhantes: (("coder coder coding more effective") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• As palavras AND, OR e NOT pode ocasionar problemas na busca; tente utilizar as aspas: "((\"coder coder coding more effective\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))*".
• Remover as aspas pode possibilitar buscas mais amplas: (( coder coder coding more effective ) OR ( in python python python programming ))*.