Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"whose computations using coverage in" » "whose computation using coverage in" (Expand search), "these computations using coverage in" (Expand search), "pose computation using coverage in" (Expand search), "whose populations using coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computations in coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computations using average in" (Expand search), "whose computations testing coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computations funding coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computations using coverage of" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"whose computations using coverage in\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( whose computations using coverage in ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("whose computations using coverage in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.