Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"whose computations testing coverage of" » "whose computations using coverage of" (Expand search), "whose combinations testing coverage of" (Expand search), "whose populations testing coverage of" (Expand search), "whose computation testing coverage of" (Expand search), "these computations testing coverage of" (Expand search), "pose computation testing coverage of" (Expand search), "whose computations test coverage of" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"whose computations testing coverage of\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( whose computations testing coverage of ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("whose computations testing coverage of") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.