Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"whose computational theory compared code" » "whose computational tool compared code" (Expand search), "whose computational tools compared code" (Expand search), "whose computational chemistry compared code" (Expand search), "whose computation theory compared code" (Expand search), "the computational theory compared code" (Expand search), "some computational theory compared code" (Expand search), "whose computational therapy compared code" (Expand search), "whose computational theory computer code" (Expand search), "whose computational theory coupled code" (Expand search), "whose computational theory compared models" (Expand search), "whose computational theory companies code" (Expand search), "whose computational theory compared cases" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"whose computational theory compared code\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( whose computational theory compared code ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("whose computational theory compared code") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.