Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"whose computational maximum coverage and" » "whose computacional maximo coverage and" (Expand search), "whose computational mashup coverage and" (Expand search), "whose computational music coverage and" (Expand search), "whose computation maximum coverage and" (Expand search), "the computational maximum coverage and" (Expand search), "some computational maximum coverage and" (Expand search), "whose computational maximum covering and" (Expand search), "whose computational maximum tolerated and" (Expand search), "whose computational maximum coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computational maximum coverage of" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"whose computational maximum coverage and\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( whose computational maximum coverage and ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("whose computational maximum coverage and") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.