Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"whose computational logic coverage from" » "whose computation logic coverage from" (Expand search), "the computational logic coverage from" (Expand search), "some computational logic coverage from" (Expand search), "whose computational cost coverage from" (Expand search), "whose computational code coverage from" (Expand search), "whose computational biology coverage from" (Expand search), "whose computational biologic coverage from" (Expand search), "whose computational low coverage from" (Expand search), "whose computational local coverage from" (Expand search), "whose computational logic beverage from" (Expand search), "whose computational logic coverage of" (Expand search), "whose computational logic coverage on" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"whose computational logic coverage from\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( whose computational logic coverage from ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("whose computational logic coverage from") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.