Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"whose computational delay coverage on" » "whose computation delay coverage on" (Expand search), "the computational delay coverage on" (Expand search), "some computational delay coverage on" (Expand search), "whose computational delays coverage on" (Expand search), "whose computational demand coverage on" (Expand search), "whose computational data coverage on" (Expand search), "whose computational dead coverage on" (Expand search), "whose computational day coverage on" (Expand search), "whose computational spray coverage on" (Expand search), "whose computational delay coverage of" (Expand search), "whose computational delay coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computational delay coverage and" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"whose computational delay coverage on\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( whose computational delay coverage on ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("whose computational delay coverage on") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.