Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"whose computational crop coverage of" » "whose computation crop coverage of" (Expand search), "the computational crop coverage of" (Expand search), "some computational crop coverage of" (Expand search), "whose computational micro coverage of" (Expand search), "whose computational cost coverage of" (Expand search), "whose computational art coverage of" (Expand search), "whose computational crown coverage of" (Expand search), "whose computational drops coverage of" (Expand search), "whose computational cusp coverage of" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"whose computational crop coverage of\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( whose computational crop coverage of ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("whose computational crop coverage of") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.