Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"whose computation using inductive programming" » "whose computation using disjunctive programming" (Expand search), "whose computation using objective programming" (Expand search), "whose computation using reactive programming" (Expand search), "pose computation using inductive programming" (Expand search), "these computations using inductive programming" (Expand search), "the computation using inductive programming" (Expand search), "whose computations using inductive programming" (Expand search), "whose computation in inductive programming" (Expand search), "whose composition using inductive programming" (Expand search), "whose computation using inductively programming" (Expand search), "whose computation using conductive programming" (Expand search), "whose computation using reductive programming" (Expand search)
"using in python python programming" » "using in pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using in piton python programming" (Expand search), "using in pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using _ python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"whose computation using inductive programming\") OR (\"using in python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( whose computation using inductive programming ) OR ( using in python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("whose computation using inductive programming") OR ("using in python python programming"))*.