Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"whose computation using constructing and" » "whose computation in constructing and" (Expand search), "whose computation using constructal and" (Expand search), "whose computation using conducting and" (Expand search), "pose computation using constructing and" (Expand search), "these computations using constructing and" (Expand search), "the computation using constructing and" (Expand search), "whose computations using constructing and" (Expand search), "whose composition using constructing and" (Expand search), "whose computation using constructions and" (Expand search), "whose computation using construction and" (Expand search), "whose computation using constructing _" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"whose computation using constructing and\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( whose computation using constructing and ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("whose computation using constructing and") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.