Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"whose computation time coverage on" » "pose computation time coverage on" (Expand search), "these computations time coverage on" (Expand search), "the computation time coverage on" (Expand search), "whose computational time coverage on" (Expand search), "whose computation the coverage on" (Expand search), "whose computation tree coverage on" (Expand search), "whose computation live coverage on" (Expand search), "whose computation time average on" (Expand search), "whose computation time coverage of" (Expand search), "whose computation time coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computation time coverage and" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("whose computation time coverage on") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"whose computation time coverage on\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( whose computation time coverage on ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.