Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"whose computation root coverage on" » "pose computation root coverage on" (Expand search), "these computations root coverage on" (Expand search), "the computation root coverage on" (Expand search), "whose computational roots coverage on" (Expand search), "whose computational foot coverage on" (Expand search), "whose computation of coverage on" (Expand search), "whose computation root coverage of" (Expand search), "whose computation root coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computation root coverage and" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("whose computation root coverage on") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"whose computation root coverage on\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( whose computation root coverage on ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.