Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"whose computation reuse coverage in" » "pose computation reuse coverage in" (Expand search), "these computations reuse coverage in" (Expand search), "the computation reuse coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computation nets coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computation tree coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computation the coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computation rule coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computation cusp coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computation tube coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computation reuse coverage of" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"whose computation reuse coverage in\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( whose computation reuse coverage in ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("whose computation reuse coverage in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.