Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"whose computation proof complexity from" » "pose computation proof complexity from" (Expand search), "these computations proof complexity from" (Expand search), "the computation proof complexity from" (Expand search), "whose computation of complexity from" (Expand search), "whose computation from complexity from" (Expand search), "whose computational probe complexity from" (Expand search), "whose computation project complexity from" (Expand search), "whose computation process complexity from" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"whose computation proof complexity from\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( whose computation proof complexity from ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("whose computation proof complexity from") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.