Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"whose computation methods coverage in" » "whose computational methods coverage in" (Expand search), "whose imputation methods coverage in" (Expand search), "whose competition methods coverage in" (Expand search), "pose computation methods coverage in" (Expand search), "these computations methods coverage in" (Expand search), "the computation methods coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computation methods clientage in" (Expand search), "whose computation networks coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computation methods over in" (Expand search), "whose computation methods coverage of" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("whose computation methods coverage in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"whose computation methods coverage in\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( whose computation methods coverage in ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.