Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"whose computation general coverage in" » "whose computational general coverage in" (Expand search), "whose competition general coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computacional general coverage in" (Expand search), "pose computation general coverage in" (Expand search), "these computations general coverage in" (Expand search), "the computation general coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computation general average in" (Expand search), "whose computation vegetal coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computation general contract in" (Expand search), "whose computation general coverage of" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"whose computation general coverage in\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( whose computation general coverage in ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("whose computation general coverage in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.