Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"whose computation effect coverage from" » "whose computational effect coverage from" (Expand search), "whose competition effect coverage from" (Expand search), "whose copulation effect coverage from" (Expand search), "pose computation effect coverage from" (Expand search), "these computations effect coverage from" (Expand search), "the computation effect coverage from" (Expand search), "whose computation effective coverage from" (Expand search), "whose computation effect covariance from" (Expand search), "whose computation effect beverage from" (Expand search), "whose computation effect coverage of" (Expand search), "whose computation effect coverage on" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"whose computation effect coverage from\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( whose computation effect coverage from ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("whose computation effect coverage from") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.